The test question for your church

Making the invisible visible

Apr 16, 2015 by

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

We tend to measure the “success” of a church by numbers. I propose in A Fellowship of Differents another way of measuring whether or not our church measures up to the kind of success that the Bible uses.

A_Fellowship_of_DifferentsThe success of a church is first determined by how many invisible people become visible to those not like them.

Asked as a question: Who is invisible in your church?

To the degree folks are invisible, we don’t have the right view of the church or the right view of the Christian life. So, let’s explore who is most invisible today. Here are some examples:

Widows. Listen to how Miriam Neff, a widow, tells her story:

I am part of the fastest growing demographic in the United States. We are targeted by new-home builders and surveyed by designers. We are a lucrative niche for health and beauty products, and financial planners invite us to dinners. It’s no wonder the marketers are after us: 800,000 join our ranks every year.

Who are we? We are the invisible among you — the widows.

Studies show that widows lose 75 percent of their friendship network when they lose a spouse. Sixty percent of us experience serious health issues in that first year. One third of us meet the criteria for clinical depression in the first month after our spouse’s death, and half of us remain clinically depressed a year later. Most experience financial decline. One pastor described us by saying we move from the front row of the church to the back, and then out the door. We move from serving and singing in choir to solitude and silent sobbing, and then on to find a place where we belong.

You get the picture. Are widows visible or invisible in your church?

What about children? Are they wall flowers and decorations and isolated and segregated or they are part of your church? What about young adults? Are they segregated or are they being brought to the table? What about seniors? Are they sitting up front or in the back (on their way out the door with the widows)?

What about races? How many races are present in your church? Are there Asian Christians in your church? Do you know they are the fastest growing ethnic group in the U.S. and that nearly 50 percent identify themselves as Christians? Are they invisible to you? Can you name some Asian Christian leaders? I can say the same about Latin and Mexican Americans. Any names come to mind? Measure that against your community. Is your church representative of the community or more mono-ethnic?

What about women? How involved are women in your church? How are women involved? Are they at the table where decisions are made? Or do men make the decision and women do the work? In the words of Carolyn Custis James, who called her book about women Half the Church, “It is no small matter that women comprise half the church. In many countries women make up a significantly higher percentage of believers — 80 percent in China and 90 percent in Japan . . . maybe these high percentages of women should make us wonder what God is doing, for he often forges significant inroads for the gospel by beginning with women. . . . When you stop to think of it, in sheer numbers, the potential we possess for expanding the kingdom is staggering.” Is your church unleashing the spiritual power of women? Is their voice heard?

What about the poor? How many poor people, unemployed people, financially struggling people are in your church? Are they even willing to let those facts be known? 

What about inner city vs. suburban? In the U.S. it has become a sign of special devotion to stake a claim for Jesus by dwelling amongst the “least of the these” by church planting in the inner city. The implication is that the suburban folks are just too compromised with the wealth of this world to care. The other side of this one is that some in the suburban churches either don’t know about the inner city or they just don’t care. So, let’s think about this together: Do we need to make the inner city folks visible in our churches? Do some inner city folks need to make the suburban folks visible? Osheta Moore says it so well: “Geography does not indicate fidelity.”

What about faith strugglers? How many folks in your church are struggling with the truth of the Bible, with science and faith, with the atonement, with hell, with what the Old Testament says about God? Do you know? Are they free to inform you? What would happen if their problems became visible?

What about the non-university educated? Is your church designed by a college graduate (almost certainly) and seminary graduate (good chance)? Does it appeal to college graduates? (Probably.) What about those who don’t give a rip about college but like to cut wood or do landscaping or paint or work on cars . . . and you can fill in with more vocations that are just as noble in our world. Does your church know them when it makes plans?

What about gays and lesbians? Let’s ignore the debates about what the Bible teaches and ask this question: Are they able to be honest about their sexual orientation? Or do they catch the message the gospel is not for them? Does your church want redemption or exclusion?

What about introverts? Is your church designed by extroverts (almost certainly) and engaging for extroverts (almost certainly) but not introverts (very likely)?

Some people have managed somehow to have a history that has collected one nonsensical episode after another while others seem to have walked straight in the script of the American dream — high school, sports, college, graduate school, good job, family, good children starring on the soccer teams. Joseph Epstein speaks of such people as “men and women who have drawn lucky numbers in life’s lottery.” We know what he means, so what about mixing different walks of life? Is your church only for the “successful and scripted” and those with lucky numbers?

What about those suffering from sexual abuse or dysfunctional families or depression or anxiety or post traumatic syndrome? Or is your church for the mentally healthy extrovert?

The apostle Paul laid down one of the most brilliant lines in the history of mankind, a set of lines that reveal God’s grand social experiment called “church,” a set of lines that reveals what God wants the church to be and therefore how the Christian life is to be understood. Paul said, and I will reformat the lines so you see how central the grand experiment, the church, was for Paul:

There is neither Jew nor Greek [ethnic],
Neither slave nor free [social class, socio-economics]
Nor is there male and female [sex or gender].
Why is there no ethnic, class and sex ordering of life?
For you are all one in Christ Jesus.

The church is the grand experiment of God where differents get connected, where unlikes form a fellowship, and where the formerly segregated are integrated. They are to be one — not scattered all over the city — and they are one in Christ Jesus, in the salad bowl that holds the differents together.

There are different cultures, and there are different socio-economic classes, and there are different genders, and there are different sexual orientations, and there are different educations and incomes and kinds of work done and preferences in music and art and worship style and sermon length. All together, at the table, in the salad bowl, thrashing it out with one another.

That thrashing it out is what the church is about and that is what the Christian life is all about: learning to love one another, by the power of God’s grace, so we can flourish as the people of God in this world. The purpose of the church is to be the kingdom in the present world and the Christian life is all about learning to live into that kingdom reality in the here and now.

Scot McKnight is the author of The Jesus Creed. He blogs at Patheos.com, where this post originally appeared.


Comments Policy

Mennonite World Review invites readers’ comments on articles. To promote constructive dialogue, editors select the comments that appear, just as we do with letters to the editor in print. These decisions are final. Writers must sign their first and last names; anonymous comments are not accepted. Comments do not appear until approved and are posted during business hours. Comments may be reproduced in print, and may be edited if selected for print.