Biased attack

Nov 21, 2016 by

Print Friendly

As I read “Rape Culture Exposed” (Editorial, Oct. 24), I was sure I was going to read about Bill Clinton’s escapades, which included a long-term affair and many other proven sexual assaults, all with Hillary Clinton’s knowledge and complicity. Not so. I instead read about Donald Trump’s vulgarity, inappropriate touching and accusations of unwanted sexual advances, all of which are reprehensible. From there, a leap to “boorish lechery,” “stoking a hateful crowd” and not having “basic human decency.” And then an attack on evangelical leaders who back him as having “lost their credibility.” I hoped for an unbiased assessment of both candidates instead of a blatantly biased attack on Trump.

In the same issue, columnist John Powell (“What Kind of Savior?”) says Trump’s popularity “calls into question the core beliefs, commitments and faith of the American people.” Really? Because we don’t blindly vote Dem­ocrat? No one contemplates replacing the Savior with Trump.

Larry Esmonde
Lima, Ohio


Comments Policy

Mennonite World Review invites readers’ comments on articles. To promote constructive dialogue, editors select the comments that appear, just as we do with letters to the editor in print. These decisions are final. Writers must sign their first and last names; anonymous comments are not accepted. Comments do not appear until approved and are posted during business hours. Comments may be reproduced in print, and may be edited if selected for print.

About Me