Coming to terms with Nazi collaboration

Paraguay conference part of a larger uncovering of a dark chapter of history

Mar 21, 2017 by and

Print Friendly

FILADELFIA, Paraguay — Violence tore through this traditionally pacifist community on the night of March 11, 1944. All the more remarkable, its perpetrators and victims were all Mennonites. And they all belonged to rival Nazi factions.

Since the end of the Second World War, Mennonite-Nazi collaboration has largely been ignored, forgotten or repressed. In Paraguay, members of Mennonite congregations were forbidden from discussing the matter.

In Paraguay and beyond, the Nazi episode has been taboo for Mennonites. Not until the 1980s, when an international search for Auschwitz physician Josef Mengele brought unwanted attention to the German-speaking Mennonite colony of Fernheim in Paraguay’s remote Gran Chaco, did that taboo begin to weaken.

Heinrich Himmler, third from right, head of the SS, at a flag-raising ceremony in the Molotschna Mennonite colony in Nazi-occupied Ukraine, 1942. Himmler and other National Socialists praised Mennonites’ allegedly Aryan blood. — Mennonite Library and Archives, North Newton, Kan.

Heinrich Himmler, third from right, head of the SS, at a flag-raising ceremony in the Molotschna Mennonite colony in Nazi-occupied Ukraine, 1942. Himmler and other National Socialists praised Mennonites’ allegedly Aryan blood. — Mennonite Library and Archives, North Newton, Kan.

Now Mennonites and others are probing that past in a series of conferences, the most recent of which took place March 10-11 in Filadelfia. Spiritual healing, reconciliation and multigenerational guilt were prominent themes at the conference, titled “The Racialist Movement and National Socialism among the Mennonites in Paraguay.”

About 200 participants gathered near the site of a brawl that had taken place exactly 73 years previously. They sought to bring into the open, contextualize and interpret events that remain painful even after they have mostly passed from living memory.

“Many have asked, ‘Why have a conference on this topic, more than 70 years after the events?’ ” said Uwe Friesen, head of the Society for the History and Culture of the Mennonites in Paraguay. In his opening address, Friesen characterized the gathering as offering “the possibility of new understanding.”

Interest for this dark chapter in Paraguayan Mennonite life comes at a time when the global church is beginning to uncover a larger history of Nazi collaboration.

In 2015, the first academic conference on the topic took place in the German city of Münster, site of the 1534 Münster Rebellion that was crucial to the founding of the Mennonite faith. Historians revealed substantial pro-Nazi movements among communities in Canada, the Netherlands, Paraguay and Brazil. By the height of Hitler’s power, one-fourth of all Mennonites worldwide lived in the Third Reich.

The Münster conference was organized by Germany’s Mennonite Historical Society — itself founded in 1933 in part to support racialist research in the new Nazi state. President Astrid von Schlachta, professor of history at the University of Regensburg, called the event “a truly historic meeting.” The gathering “represented an open and nuanced discussion, in which we judged without condemning the context and experiences of Mennonites in the Nazi period,” she said.

‘Home to the Reich’?

Given Fernheim’s formerly pro-German stance — along with the arrival of thousands of Mennonite migrants from postwar Europe, including known war criminals — Nazi hunters considered the colony a likely hideout for Mengele. (He was eventually found dead in Brazil.)

Mennonite refugees from the Soviet Union had established Fernheim in 1930, receiving humanitarian assistance from the German government. Three years later, a majority were effusive in their praise for Hitler.

“With great excitement, we German Mennonites of the Paraguayan Chaco too participate in the events of our dear Motherland and experience the national revolution of the German race,” colony leaders wrote in a letter to the Fuehrer.

Nazi officials proposed the Mennonites return to Europe, citing their alleged blood purity.

Already, racial anthropologists had tested the Fernheim settlers, finding them more Aryan than the average German. Eighty percent were reportedly prepared to renounce pacifism and join Hitler’s “Home to the Reich” program, an undertaking thwarted by the outbreak of war.

Mennonite settlers in Paraguay’s Fernheim Colony, as refugees from the Soviet Union, were susceptible to Hitler’s platform of nationalism, anti-Bolshevism and anti-Semitism. Here, the Neufeld family celebrates a silver wedding anniversary in 1930. — Mennonite Library and Archives, North Newton, Kan.

Mennonite settlers in Paraguay’s Fernheim Colony, as refugees from the Soviet Union, were susceptible to Hitler’s platform of nationalism, anti-Bolshevism and anti-Semitism. Here, the Neufeld family celebrates a silver wedding anniversary in 1930. — Mennonite Library and Archives, North Newton, Kan.

Cut off from Germany, Fernheim’s residents disagreed about how best to maintain Nazi loyalty. A power struggle ensued that focused on colony administration, control of the German-language schools and access to return transportation to the Reich. Young men gathered whips and clubs, and they severely beat six competitors. The unrest prompted intervention from U.S. diplomats and the Paraguayan military, ultimately leading to the banishment of several ringleaders.

Three-quarters of a century later, Friesen hopes for healing.

“It is important that we consider facts, that we analyze and present events in a way that builds peace, both drawing on and propagating our Anabaptist inheritance,” he said, referring to the pacifist theology once again prominent in Fernheim.

Guilt and forgiveness

Attendees of the symposium — which featured historians from Paraguay, Germany and the United States — agreed that local tensions should be consigned to history. They also saw the gathering as part of an ongoing conversation.

Discussion will continue at a third conference, on “Mennonites and the Holocaust,” scheduled for March 2018 at Bethel College in North Newton, Kan. (see below).

New evidence has implicated some Mennonites in genocide. Especially in Nazi-occupied Ukraine, large German-speaking colonies drew favor from National Socialists such as Alfred Rosenberg and Heinrich Himmler. Local recruits bolstered death squads, which massacred tens of thousands of Jews in and around the settlements.

Organizers have called for papers detailing cases of Mennonites aiding Jews and other targeted populations, as well as instances in which members benefited from ethnic cleansing or themselves perpetrated war crimes.

The recent gatherings in Germany and Paraguay have demonstrated a willingness among Mennonites to forgive each other.

“Making peace means living out and offering reconciliation,” Friesen said at Fernheim’s symposium.

But the greater and more ecumenical challenge is the church’s responsibility toward non-Mennonite victims of Nazism. Mennonite World Conference has recently accepted apologies from Lutheran and Catholic bodies regarding persecution of Mennonites during the Reformation. Questions of Mennonites’ own collective guilt, during the Nazi period and beyond, remain.

Ben Goossen is a scholar of global religious history at Harvard University. He is the author of Chosen Nation: Mennonites and Germany in a Global Era, to be published in May.

Bethel College to host Holocaust conference
Bethel College

NORTH NEWTON, Kan. — A call for papers has been issued for an academic conference on Mennonites and the Holocaust at Bethel College March 16-17, 2018.

Conference co-organizers are Mark Jantzen, Bethel professor of history; John Thiesen, archivist for the Mennonite Library and Archives at Bethel; and John Sharp, a faculty member in history and Bible and religion at Hess­ton College.

Mennonite Church USA is the co-sponsor.

The event aims to document, publicize and analyze Mennonite attitudes, environments and interactions with others in Europe during the 1930s and 1940s that shaped their responses to and engagement with Nazi ideology and the events of the Holocaust.

“Mennonites have typically seen themselves foremost as victims of violence in the 1930s and ’40s in Europe,” Jantzen said. “But we hope the conference will document and analyze a much more complex reality that places Mennonites across a whole spectrum of responses, experiences and motivations, along a range of suffering violence to witnessing it and causing it.”

The keynote speaker will be Doris Bergen, who holds the Chancellor Rose and Ray Wolfe Chair in Holocaust Studies at the University of Toronto.

For more information, see mla.bethelks.edu/MennosandHolocaust.


Comments Policy

Mennonite World Review invites readers’ comments on articles. To promote constructive dialogue, editors select the comments that appear, just as we do with letters to the editor in print. These decisions are final. Writers must sign their first and last names; anonymous comments are not accepted. Comments do not appear until approved and are posted during business hours. Comments may be reproduced in print, and may be edited if selected for print.

  • Conrad Ermle

    How many Mennonites died in the concentration camps or were imprisoned by the Nazis? Why not? That alone should tell us a lot. Old Nazi apologists and their childfren still exist in some of our Mennonite communities, including the villages and city of Winkler in Manitoba, not just Paraguay and Mexico. There were also Mennonites who served Stalin, Lenin and the Communist movement. These also should be exposed (studied and researched). Some are still alive. There are still a lot of hidden secrets in the world of Menno. – Conrad Ermle

    • Evan Knappenberger

      There are a lot of microfascists — a philosophical term I’m borrowing from Deleuze and Guattari — right here in MCUSA, and I’m not just referring to the Trump-loving conservatives who are sorely misguided, but also to those liberals who would style themselves crusaders in the scapegoating circus of “victim advocacy.”

      Evan Knappenberger

  • Rainer Moeller

    I’m all for publishing the facts. The more relevant part is the evaluation of the facts. There are two iron rules which must not be forgotten: 1. Mennonites were morally obliged to defend Nazis against false accusations (where they knew or supposed that the accusations were false). 2. Mennonites were morally obliged to express gratitude to Germany, where Germany had really helped them.

    Then, we must not mix up political commentary with taking sides in the Great War. Personally I think that Churchill’s approach to democracy (as the least bad system) was much more reasonable and pragmatical than Hitler’s or Stalin’s approach. But Churchill’s war or Roosevelt’s war was in no way better than Hitler’s war or Stalin’s war.
    As for “collective guilt” I have never felt much sympathy with all these ritual apologies by Lutherans or Catholics. Mennonites oughtn’t to have played a part in these rituals.Guilt is a personal matter. But if someone insists on speaking about a collective guilt of Lutherans, Catholics or Mennonites, logic should oblige him to think about a collective guilt of Jews, too.

  • Rainer Moeller

    This conference comes – accidentally?? – at a time when there’s a strong American war party again: namely neo-conservatives and liberal hawks who style themselves as a revival of the American war party 1935-1940 which promoted the “Good War” (and who style their opponents as the successors of “America First”).
    I am very uneasy about that political context. Is there really so much interest in finding out perpetrations of Mennonites at exotic places like Paraguay or Ukrainiya? Isn’t this more about shaming American Mennonites because of their anti-war stance and activities 1935-1940?

About Me