Opinion: You can prevent abuse

A church that keeps children safe meets three essential standards

Apr 10, 2017 by and

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

For many of us, church feels good and safe. We were loved there as children and respected there as adults. In fact, we often describe our churches as “families” or caring communities where all are accepted. We trust one another and feel confident that others want the best for us and our families.

But for some of us, church was not only unsafe, it was destructive. Abuse by a church leader or an adult in the church community impacts us forever and can drastically change how a victim/survivor understands God.

We know one in six boys will experience some form of sexual abuse and one in four girls. While this abuse hasn’t necessarily occurred in church settings, we can consider how much of our lives and our children’s lives are connected to church and church institutions like schools, camps and more.

No church is immune to an abuse crisis. And if we’re not a part of the solution, we may be part of the problem.

The clear majority of victims/ survivors know their offender as a family member or friend of the family. This gives new meaning to the “we’re like family” description. We don’t need to start distrusting everyone, but we should acknowledge that the higher the trust, the higher the risk that an offender may exploit our trust. “Stranger danger” is a myth.

Without diminishing the gifts that church offers for people of all ages, it is important to create healthy boundaries so that churches can be safe spaces for everyone, especially children.

We can prevent abuse and learn how to respond well after a crisis. Your church can act now to keep kids safe tomorrow. Here are three main steps to becoming a safe church:

Create and implement a policy. A child-protection policy communicates to everyone that children are valued, and it serves as a reminder that adults are responsible for keeping children safe. Avoid working on this alone. Share the load with a safe church committee made up of men and women — and perhaps a known survivor who is open to participating. Remember victims/survivors do exist in your church and can help lead the way in creating a culture of safety. In your policy, consider facility safety, supervision of children and the two-adult rule, screening and background checks for volunteers, social media/communication guidelines, transportation challenges and the risks and benefits of mentoring programs.

Have regular training for adults and children. While we can teach and empower children to say no or to talk to their parents when they feel unsafe, we can’t expect them to prevent grooming and abuse on their own. This is up to the adults, and many adults need information and training to enable them to aid in these efforts. Ideally, your policy would require annual trainings for volunteers and staff working with children, but including all adults has many benefits. Bringing in local resource people from your community for these trainings helps build awareness and partnerships. Dove’s Nest Speaker’s Bureau provides these trainings.

While sexual abuse is the most common form of abuse in church settings, also teach about the other types of abuse — physical, emotional and neglect. Make it a goal to use Circle of Grace, a Christian safe-environment curriculum. Remember that some adolescents also commit sexual violence against their peers or younger children. Christian education can support a culture of safety. Also, be wary of using youth to care for children unsupervised.

Talk about boundaries and appropriate touch. Part of the work of a safe church committee is to create an atmosphere where all bodies are respected. Allow children to initiate affection, and teach adults that affectionate touch is best when observable and interruptible. Adults should feel free to decline hugs or other kinds of touch. If a youth says he or she feels uncomfortable with someone, take him or her seriously. Whether a touch is good, bad or confusing is determined by the receiver’s experience of the touch, not by the intentions of the person doing the touching. The pulpit and Sunday school classes offer places for abuse to be named and to lift up children.

Dealing with pushback

Keeping children safe seems like something everyone would easily agree about, but don’t be surprised when people question some parts of the policy or the renewed emphasis on safety. Unfortunately, many of us doubt stories of abuse or find ourselves skeptical of victims/ survivors. So be prepared for pushback. Address cynicism directly and with care.

For example, someone might say, “We don’t want to scare people away from interacting with children.” The first thing is to educate adults in your trainings about what grooming is and is not. Grooming is not general friendliness to children. Grooming is finding ways to be alone with a child or showing one child special attention with the intention to sexually harm him or her.

Encourage adults to talk to children and youth. Many youth want to be heard and to have genuine conversations with adults at their church. Affection and kindness can safely happen in public and be interruptible — and still be meaningful to children and youth.

Reporting abuse

  • If a child/youth discloses abuse to you or you suspect abuse, believe him or her and make a report immediately to Child Protective Services or the police. You don’t have to have evidence or proof. Do not do the investigation yourself — or anything that resembles that. Cooperate with professionals who conduct the investigation.
  • After reporting, notify the pastor and/or child protection team.
  • Immediately attend to the victim and his or her family’s safety and needs through church leadership and an outside agency, like a child advocacy center. Keep the victim’s needs at the center of any process.
  • Immediately relieve the alleged offender from all responsibilities involving contact with children until the conclusion of the investigation.
  • Consider the likelihood that there is more than one individual harmed.
  • Within 48 hours, notify all parents whose children may have encountered the alleged offender. Let them know that allegations have been made and reported.
  • Keep victims and offenders separated during the investigation. Support child victims in engaging in age-appropriate activities.
  • Inform area conference leadership or the equivalent.
  • After the investigation, follow all legal implications for the offender. Inform the entire church. Secrecy not only makes children unsafe, it also does not help offenders.
  • Even if the abuse is not confirmed, attend to the dynamics that prompted the allegations and consider the degree to which victims and offenders need to remain separated.
  • Make pastoral care available to all involved. Prioritize the needs of the victim over the offender.
  • Communities need healing from crisis. This can happen through informational meetings, gatherings to hear harms and feelings and formation of a task force to do problem-solving.

Anna Groff is executive director of Dove’s Nest: Faith Communities Keeping Children and Youth Safe. See dovesnest.net for materials, resources, blogs and other recommended organizations. This article was written for Meetinghouse, a group of Mennonite publications.


Comments Policy

Mennonite World Review invites readers’ comments on articles. To promote constructive dialogue, editors select the comments that appear, just as we do with letters to the editor in print. These decisions are final. Writers must sign their first and last names; anonymous comments are not accepted. Comments do not appear until approved and are posted during business hours. Comments may be reproduced in print, and may be edited if selected for print.

  • James Foxvog

    In a group I was in, CPS was called over suspected abuse. But the abuse was all in the fears of the adults relating to misunderstanding the talk of young children. A number of requirements were placed on the young teenaged alleged offender. It took a long time to clear things up. Meanwhile the young woman who was accused turned away from the church. Please use “alleged offender” rather than “offender” until an offense is legally proven when the offense is denied. Abuse is much too common and terrible. So are false accusations which are also much too common and also destroy people’s lives.

    • Evan Knappenberger

      Thank you for clarifying this. I hate to say it, but it seems to me that these victim-advocates don’t really care about stopping abuse, only scapegoating people they don’t like. (Look at Berry Friesen’s write-up on the Lindale situation for one example.) Actually trying to understand the nuance of any given situation is not within the realm of possibility for these people, as their focus is elsewhere and their methods are exaggerated, immoderate and unbalanced. To these people, destroying a few careers and a few lives and a few churches is a small price to pay for exacting revenge on the people they’ve targeted. What’s scary is, the people running the denomination are actually listening to them.

      Evan Knappenberger

  • Berry Friesen

    James, to clarify Evan’s comment, I think he is referring to comments posted here at MWR in response to its article “Report cites pastoral protection in Virginia abuse case.”

    http://mennoworld.org/2017/01/19/news/report-cites-pastoral-protection-in-virginia-abuse-case/

  • Joshua Rodd

    Dealing with abuse really needs an integrated, culture-wide response with the right authority involved at each level.

    I would look at what Keystone Mennonite Fellowship is doing, particularly in Pennsylvania, including their written policies and their handbook on the topic, the latter of which they share with Eastern Pa. Menn. Conference.

    I would also listen to David Bercot’s talk at AIC in 2017; he is an actual lawyer. Particularly of note to me was an Amish community that decided to engage the local sheriff they already had a good relationship with. The only real change to how they do things was:

    1. Immediately have the leaders of the church notify the sheriff upon suspected abuse or an accusation

    2. Separate the alleged victim and the accused. This can take considerable resources in a family setting, but those are resources we should have.

    3. The church can handle rehabiliting the accused and finding out what actually happened, provided the local sheriff stayed informed and involved.

    4. Altered their structure of church disicipline where someone who refused to comply with court mandated rehabilition, refused to take seriously #2, etc. is ultimately excommunicated. At that point all responsibllity shifts to law enforcement.

    I see a lack of concern for false accusations and the rights of the accused in this article. It’s possible to respect a suspect whilst still keeping an alleged victim safe.

About Me

advertisement