Building a peace resume together

Nov 1, 2017 by

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

“Everyone’s a pacifist between wars. It’s like being a vegetarian between meals.” — Colman McCarthy, journalist, pacifist and peace activist

This coming Sunday evening at Rainbow Mennonite Church (6-8 p.m. Nov. 5), we will hold a multi-age conversation on conscientious objection and pacifism in the 21st century. Our youth group members and leaders hope a variety of people of all ages, genders and backgrounds attend — so consider this your invitation!

We will hear a variety of stories and perspectives, including a reflection on how one can identify as a CO when applying for U.S. citizenship. During a potluck meal we will discuss some of the common critiques of conscientious objection and pacifism, and then after supper we will look at the nuts and bolts of registering for the draft including how one can begin identifying oneself as a conscientious objector. I stress begin because CO status will not be officially recognized or denied unless a draft is reinstated.

Organizations like the Center on Conscience and War advise people, especially young people who wish to identify as COs, to begin building a CO resume complete with a comprehensive statement of one’s pacifist beliefs, documentation of activities that help to support that claim and letters of support. If and when a draft begins, this resume will help prove to a draft board a consistency and longevity of pacifist beliefs.

And herein lies a challenge and invitation, especially in a day and age when we don’t have a military draft. What does it mean to begin building a peace file or resume? What are we doing today to support our pacifist, nonviolent, nonresistant beliefs? As the quote above articulates, it’s easy to identify oneself as a CO or pacifist in theory or on paper, just as it is easy to be a vegetarian between meals, but what does it look like in practice, especially when faced with oppression or cruelty, or life-and-death situations?

Miroslav Volf writes in his book, Exclusion and Embrace, that we live in a world whose order too often rests on or depends on violence. He urges those who seek to follow the Prince of Peace to find alternatives to the sword, for too often, “the sword intended to root out violence ends up fostering it.” However, for nonviolence to be effective, Volf says it must be part of a larger strategy of combating systems of terror. Nonviolence can become barren, he writes, if it shies away from injustice and oppression.

In other words, those who seek to follow the Prince of Peace are called to find alternatives to the sword not only in word, but in deed. The good news is that it’s never too late to begin, or begin again this work of building a peace resume.

Do we as Mennonites have this figured out? Hardly! That is why gatherings like the one we are holding on Sunday seem important. Let’s find our way together, ever aware of our own missteps, inching our way closer to Jesus’ active, nonviolent way of peace.

Resources:

Ruth Harder is the pastor of Rainbow Mennonite Church in Kansas City, Kan. She blogs at Over and Around the Rainbow, where this first appeared.


Comments Policy

Mennonite World Review invites readers’ comments on articles. To promote constructive dialogue, editors select the comments that appear, just as we do with letters to the editor in print. These decisions are final. Writers must sign their first and last names; anonymous comments are not accepted. Comments do not appear until approved and are posted during business hours. Comments may be reproduced in print, and may be edited if selected for print.

  • Rainer Moeller

    1.If you want to do something positive for peace, try to create agreements – above all agreements about what’s just and unjust. People who only fight for their own concept of justice don’t do anything positive for peace. Eventually they may, voluntary or involuntary, start a civil war
    2. It would be extremely useful to form an agreement that all kinds of conscience ought to be protected likewise- not only the conscience of the pacifist. If the pacifists protect the conscience of someone who shyes away from an abortion (or from serving a homosexual marriage), those others would be more interested in protecting the conscience of the pacifist.