The tax reform we need

Tax-cut winners, losers have a familiar ring

Jan 15, 2018 by

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The pliable instructions Jesus gives for paying taxes leave plenty of room for interpretation: “Render therefore to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s” (Matt. 22:21). Context — then and now — is key to interpretation. But more often than not, the Christian who pays taxes and gives to godly causes will come to an ironclad conclusion that supports whatever he or she wanted to do in the first place.

While it’s nice that the U.S. tax laws ushered in by Republicans will send fewer coins Caesar’s way, it’s unfortunate that the biggest cuts went to the wealthiest earners, heirs and corporations — and that surviving loopholes don’t do more to encourage charitable donations.

Federal income taxes are often considered more loathsome than local fare because they fund more distant causes. The growth of income taxation has always been closely linked to military pursuits. Congress imposed the first income tax in 1861 to pay for the Civil War. After lapsing in 1872, the income tax returned permanently in 1913, ramping up dramatically to pay for World War I and still higher for World War II. The military and tax expansion never subsided.

For better or worse, today’s federal tax plan has been settled, reducing estimated income over the next decade by $1.5 trillion. The next battle will be over spending. Congressional leaders are already eyeing slashes to safety-net programs like Social Security and Medicare.

It would be more appropriate, and improve the lives of more Americans, to look instead to federal income taxation’s roots and reduce military spending.

Rather than deterring terrorism, American military incursions are the biggest recruiting tool for extremist groups. North Korea has not been dissuaded from developing stronger weapons; if anything, it feels a nuclear option is needed now more than ever.

Not counting about $93 billion in veterans and nuclear security costs, proposed 2018 military spending grew last month beyond budget caps to $700 billion. Abandoning his populist campaign charade, President Trump last year asked for $30 billion more in military spending, in spite of the Department of Defense’s desire to cut costs by consolidating bases.

We’d prefer the U.S. government render to the Pentagon what little should be the Pentagon’s and give the people a tax break for rendering to charities that do God’s work.

Comments Policy

Mennonite World Review invites readers’ comments on articles. To promote constructive dialogue, editors select the comments that appear, just as we do with letters to the editor in print. These decisions are final. Writers must sign their first and last names; anonymous comments are not accepted. Comments do not appear until approved and are posted during business hours. Comments may be reproduced in print, and may be edited if selected for print.

  • Ned Netterville

    Tim, those words of Jesus, among his most oft-quoted statements, need no interpretation, nor should one try, for virtually all of the interpretations I have ever seen have in truth been misinterpretations. Jesus said what he meant and meant what he said. “Render unto Caesar what is Ceasar’s” is a simple, plain, explicit affirmation of one’s right to private property, which can be deduced from the Ten Commandments, to wit: Do not take or keep what isn’t yours. Do not steal. If you have anything belonging to Caesar, give it back to him. And the only possible corollary: If you have nothing belonging to Caesar, give hime that–nothing! Jesus couldn’t be fooled by the sophistry that says taxation is not stealing. Taxation is identical in every respect to the felony crime of extortion, except the state immunizes its collectors from prosecution. Jesus would not be fooled as so many Christians are. His brilliant response to a question meant to trap him, so his words could be reported to P. Pilate, who was in charge of collecting Rome’s taxes in all of Judea, not only served as a condemnation of taxation, they served to point up the fact that Caesar was a thief; that everything he owned had been stolen from others by means of conquest, plunder, enslavement or violent taxation. And to make himself and his condemnation perfectly clear, he added, “Give God what belongs to God.” This, of course, requires knowning what belongs to God and Caesar respectfully. We may be sure that Jesus would follow Scripture in resolving that conundrum. Scripture is unequivocal on the subject for it states in at least six places, as in Psalm 24, verse 1: “The earth is the Lord’s and all that is in it,” which leaves nothing for poor old Caesar, and nothing is what Jesus would have his disciples pay the state in taxes.

About Me


Latest from MWR