Mennonites helped turn Paraguay into a mega beef producer — indigenous people may pay the price

Mar 30, 2020 by

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The “new Panama Canal” — that’s how some are hailing a highway now under construction in South America that spans the continent, from the Atlantic to the Pacific.

The Bi-Oceanic Corridor cuts through the Paraguayan Chaco, Latin America’s second-largest forest after the Amazon — and, these days, a hub of cattle ranching and soybean farming.

Heavy machinery lays the foundation for the new bi-oceanic highway through the Paraguayan Chaco in June. — Joel E. Correia

Heavy machinery lays the foundation for the new bi-oceanic highway through the Paraguayan Chaco in June. — Joel E. Correia

The Chaco — once a flat, scrubby and supposedly inhospitable forest — was transformed into a fertile agricultural region by Mennonite settlers who came to Paraguay in the early 1900s.

By 2017 this landlocked country of 7 million had become the world’s sixth-largest exporter of beef. When the new road is completed in 2022, it will markedly increase beef and other agricultural exports by truck to global markets via seaports in Chile and Brazil.

The bi-oceanic highway is only one visible sign of the Chaco’s agricultural boom: Extensive deforestation also scars the region. Roughly 14 percent of the Chaco forest was cut down between 2001 and 2014.

The Mennonites’ success in transforming the Chaco into a ranching powerhouse now undermines their own long-sought solitude, endangers this famous forest and threatens the very existence of indigenous people who’ve lived in the region since time immemorial.

Mennonites of the Chaco

The Mennonites of the Para­guayan Chaco, who now number around 40,000, first arrived in the 1920s, escaping persecution from Stalin’s Russia by way of Canada.

In some Latin American Mennonite colonies, members wear distinctive conservative clothing — often bonnets and long dresses for women and denim overalls with plaid shirts for men — and ride bicycles and horses as transportation. Other Mennonite colonies, like in Filadelfia or Neuland in Paraguay, lead a modern lifestyle based on ranching and agriculture.

Taming the ‘Green Hell’

When the Mennonites arrived to Paraguay a century ago, the country was at the brink of war with neighboring Bolivia, which claimed the Chaco as its own.

The Paraguayan government granted the new Mennonite arrivals citizenship and land in the Chaco, with guarantees they could maintain their educational systems, speak their language and avoid military conscription. Allowing Mennonites to establish settlements in the Chaco reasserted Paraguay’s territorial claims but dispossessed many indigenous peoples from their lands.

With its extreme heat, thorny plants, scarce water and difficult conditions, many early Mennonite settlers called the Chaco a “Green Hell.” Nevertheless, their relative isolation and autonomy promised a long-sought freedom.

Mennonites continued arriving to Paraguay through the late 1940s. They worked collectively, in agricultural cooperatives, to develop the Chaco.

As their businesses grew, particularly cattle ranching, so did the need for reliable transportation to get their products to markets more quickly. In the 1960s Mennonite organizations helped get a highway called the Trans-Chaco built. Today it is a partially paved, pothole-ridden highway abhorred by truckers. It will soon be completely reconstructed even as the the Bi-Oceanic Corridor is underway.

With strong global demand for Paraguayan beef and other agricultural exports, many Mennonite communities today are thriving. In one of South America’s poorest countries, they enjoy living standards comparable to those in Spain or Portugal.

Changes on the frontier

The Mennonite’s success has come at a high cost, though, when it comes to environmental change, land conflicts and indigenous rights, my research in Paraguay finds.

The growing beef industry and expansion of soybean production from Brazil into eastern Para­guay are pushing ever more people into the Chaco. The population of Boquerón — the farming region of the Chaco where Paraguay’s Mennonite colonies are located — increased from about 15,000 in 1982 to roughly 67,000 today, according to government data.

Farmland, once cheap and plentiful for those willing to clear it, is getting prohibitively expensive. And as more people move in, the Chaco forest is disappearing ever faster. Deforestation is exacerbating conflicts over land rights with indigenous communities seeking to regain their ancestral lands.

Indigenous peoples are the hardest hit by change in the Chaco.

Some Ayoreo Totobiegosode communities, for example, live in voluntary isolation from broader society. Expanding development threatens their territories in the Chaco, undermining their right to life.

The Chaco’s deforestation impacts other indigenous Para­guayans, whose traditional livelihoods and cultural practices rely on the animals and plants now being replaced by soybeans and cows. Many indigenous communities additionally complain that agriculture has limited their ability to access the Chaco’s scarce water.

Paraguayan President Mario Abdo Benítez expects many more people to settle in the Chaco after the Bi-Oceanic Corridor highway is complete, drawn by the new economic opportunities it will bring.

The influx means the Mennonite communities who converted Paraguay’s so-called “Green Hell” into a mega beef exporter are experiencing unforeseen consequences too. The solitude they once sought is slipping away.

As new residents move into the Chaco, the rhythm of life is changing. Once quite streets buzz with the motorcycles that are now ubiquitous, as people ride to and from work. Bars have popped up, playing music late into the hot, dusty nights.

Joel E. Correia is assistant professor of Latin American studies at the University of Florida. This article was originally published by The Conversation, theconversation.com.


Comments Policy

Mennonite World Review invites readers’ comments on articles. To promote constructive dialogue, editors select the comments that appear, just as we do with letters to the editor in print. These decisions are final. Writers must sign their first and last names; anonymous comments are not accepted. Comments do not appear until approved and are posted during business hours. Comments may be reproduced in print, and may be edited if selected for print.